Out of the World Cup, Indian hockey group should reply these 7 questions | Hockey Information

Trending News World News


BHUBANESWAR: “Fortunately, I did not purchase tickets for the remainder of the video games.” The catastrophe that unfolded on the Kalinga Stadium on Sunday night time has left a mark that will not simply be erased, if it does in any respect, from the thoughts of followers. The above comment on social media by a fan highlights what the game is liable to shedding after India’s World Cup exit exterior of the highest eight.
One other fan was travelling to Bhubaneswar along with his spouse and nine-month-old child to look at India within the quarterfinals of the World Cup when India’s battle and New Zealand’s management within the crossover recreation on Sunday had been giving jitters to the household.
“Welcome to Odisha…there’s quite a bit to supply in Odisha past hockey,” a tweet responding to the household’s dismay learn.
The followers had been principally providing their shoulders to one another to cry on. India misplaced to New Zealand in sudden loss of life (5-4), after twice main with a two-goal margin, 2-0 and 3-1. After the regulation time of 60 minutes the scoreboard learn 3-3. The following penalty shootout ended at 3-3 as nicely, solely due to PR Sreejesh’s consecutive saves that introduced India again from the lifeless. He saved the primary try by NZ in sudden loss of life as nicely, injuring himself within the course of. However it gave skipper Harmanpreet Singh an ideal setting to redeem his disastrous World Cup as a participant.
Had Harmanpreet scored in sudden loss of life, he would have lifted the temper of your entire nation. The fan above would have purchased tickets and the younger household travelling to look at the World Cup would not have felt disenchanted about their choice.

Picture credit score: Hockey India
However neither coach Graham Reid nor skipper Harmanpreet Singh talked concerning the ‘accountability’ that each had talked about so emphatically of their addresses to the media earlier than Sunday.
With the good thing about hindsight at their disposal now, the Indian group administration should reply these seven questions:
1. Why could not India shield a two-goal lead twice within the match?
India’s defence by no means regarded organized in simply the primary knockout recreation they performed on the World Cup. The New Zealanders discovered straightforward passage into the Indian circle, particularly within the final quarter, when the defenders had been noticed ready for the Kiwi attackers contained in the circle, whereas they need to have been tackling them exterior the D. It was the identical mistake India dedicated within the 2018 Asian Video games last towards Malaysia. The group misplaced on each events.

Embed-Hockey-2301-PTI

PTI Picture
2. Why did the Indian defence buckle beneath strain within the final 16 minutes?
It was not that India did not get possession within the final quarter. However on most events when an Indian participant acquired the ball, it took just some seconds for a NZ participant to reclaim it, both by way of an unforced error or by forcing the Indian gamers to cross the ball in a rush when it will have been wiser to carry onto it, spray the ball round and construct an assault. That did not occur, probably a psychological block when in a successful scenario within the dying minutes. The same method nearly price India expensive within the bronze-medal playoff towards Germany within the Tokyo Olympics as nicely.
3. Why had been 4 kids requested to deal with the strain of the shootouts?
It was troublesome to fathom the choice when skipper Harmanpreet Singh led Rajkumar Pal, Sukhjeet Singh, Shamsher Singh and Abhishek as India’s selections for the penalty shootout. After all, the group decides this stuff pre-match, which suggests solely coach Graham Reid can reply why the a lot skilled gamers like Manpreet Singh (318 matches), Akashdeep Singh (222), Mandeep Singh (198) and Lalit Upadhyay (137) weren’t among the many 5 when the group was on the fringe of a World Cup exit.
4. Why is “creating alternatives” changing into rhetorical in Indian hockey?
It is not that India have not created probabilities or did not have sufficient pictures at objective. The attacking model that the group performs offers them sufficient alternatives to attain, however the numbers round ‘circle penetrations’ do not take a group wherever until nearly all of these are transformed into targets. The goalless draw within the pool recreation towards England is a traditional instance on this context. Had India gained that recreation, they might have topped the pool and secured a direct spot within the quarterfinals.
5. Why wasn’t the group capable of finding an answer to their penalty-corner (PC) woes 4 matches in a row?
It has been one of many greatest speaking factors of India’s sorry marketing campaign, particularly because the recreation towards England when the hosts earned eight penalty corners however may convert none. In 4 matches up to now on this World Cup, India have earned 30 PCs and scored off solely 5. The unhappy half is that solely twice India’s direct drag-flicks discovered the mark, as soon as towards Wales when the guests had withdrawn their goalkeeper, which can also be drag-flick professional Harmanpreet’s solely objective up to now. And second when Varun Kumar sounded the board towards New Zealand. Such have been Harmanpreet’s woes off drag-flicks on this World Cup that he missed a penalty stroke as nicely towards Spain.

Embed-Hockey2-2301-PTI

PTI Picture
6. What precisely had been Bram Lomans’s inputs within the camp performed for India’s penalty-corner specialists final December?
Sarcastically, the Netherlands’ drag-flick professional Bram Lomans was introduced in by Hockey India to conduct a camp for the Indian drag-flickers a month earlier than the World Cup. What the inputs had been for Indian gamers throughout that week-long camp is one other query that is ready for a solution, particularly as a result of Harmanpreet went fully off-colour throughout the event in Rourkela and Bhubaneswar.
7. Why did the group not re-assess Tokyo Olympics hero Simranjeet Singh’s health earlier than asserting the squad of 18, whereas Varun Kumar, who was faraway from the core group concurrently Simranjeet, was recalled to the nationwide camp forward of group choice?
It is once more in hindsight, however Hardik Singh’s harm ruling him out after the pool recreation towards England would not have affected India as a lot if attacking midfielder and Junior World Cup winner Simranjeet Singh was within the 18 or among the many two alternate gamers (standbys).
For causes associated to health, Simranjeet was overlooked of the core group a couple of months earlier than the World Cup. If he was unfit, it will have been maybe much more logical to maintain him within the core group and the nationwide camp, which might have provided him one of the best likelihood to return to full health earlier than the World Cup, if the group administration discovered him unfit. However Simranjeet was denied that likelihood. Nonetheless, Varun Kumar, who was probably sanctioned for his errors throughout the Commonwealth Video games, was re-included into the core group.
Additionally, ignoring strikers Gurjant Singh and Dilpreet Singh had been selections that had been additionally questioned when India’s World Cup squad was introduced, which noticed the beforehand injured Lalit Upadhyay and playmaker Vivek Sagar Prasad making a comeback. Each have underperformed at this World Cup, except Lalit’s solely respectable outing towards New Zealand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *